![lg hl dt st bd re wh16ns40 lg hl dt st bd re wh16ns40](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41rAw98L-uL._SX300_.jpg)
The F1ST may look similar to the other two, but things are running very differently under the hood. I've never used the 24B3ST, but it seems to me like you are getting comparable performance and behaviour to what I get with the B1ST. I always sort of viewed them as a "fall back" if I ended up having issues with the more affordable drives. I've never used their drives but I knew of their former reputation for being reliable and of premium quality. Under 2 minutes for burst mode.Ĭlick to expand.Yeah, it's too bad what happened to Plextor.
![lg hl dt st bd re wh16ns40 lg hl dt st bd re wh16ns40](https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/db9022e7-caee-4572-a763-592189ec8032_1.7cef2fc5d159bed63cf4c8d160964dfc.jpeg)
It's under 6 minutes to rip a 50 minute CD in secure mode. Ripping with Exact Audio Copy - what are acceptable speeds? Don't know how it behaves as a regular internal drive.Įdit: Here's a post where I timed the Plextor drive in EAC for secure, fast, and burst modes: I've only used the drive in a USB enclosure. Could be a better ripping drive, but could also be much much worse. The Plextor is good enough for me to keep using. The Plextor can rip a HTOA track, but I resorted to a burst mode rip because secure wasn't behaving. It does reasonably well with scratched CDs, but my Asus DRW-24B3ST does better. It works with secure ripping at a good speed. I use it in a USB 3.0 external enclosure. I decided to try that drive because it is a duplication grade drive designed for heavier use in a duplicator. I got a Plextor PX-891SAF-R drive earlier this year. There's one other drive I could try from the shop - an LG GH24NSC0 - but I'm not sure it's worth the hassle of bringing home and trying when it's likely to yield the same results as the other two. Any other EAC users notice any problems with recently manufactured drives? Looks like I may have to resort to finding an older used optical drive to serve as a spare in case the 24B1ST wears out. The makes and models of the new DVD-RW drives that I tried are: It appears that neither of the new drives can be trusted for EAC secure mode rips. Meanwhile the 24B1ST makes a perfect rip of that CD. Both drives reported suspicious positions on the same tracks of the same CD. However, after ripping the CD with cache enabled, the log indicated that no tracks could be verified as accurate, and also reported suspicious positions for two of the tracks. I bypassed the checkbox to disable the audio cache, and they ripped at a more respectable 8x, finishing a rip within about 10 minutes, which is normal. When I tried ripping with either drive after disabling the audio cache, secure mode slowed down to a painful 0.1x and reported an estimated ripping time of 6 hours for one CD(!). Both drives reported caching audio data, and both drives reported C2 errors on a scratched disc when there are none, as confirmed by my trusty 24B1ST. I've purchased two drives so far, both of which were brand new, and neither was able to rip audio CDs properly using EAC secure mode. I'm not sure if that's why I'm having difficulty configuring these new drives for use with EAC secure mode rips, but it's certainly a suspicious coincidence.
#Lg hl dt st bd re wh16ns40 Pc
Worrying that optical media is on its way out for PC technology, I decided to grab a second internal DVD-RW drive for my desktop PC, in case my ASUS 24B1ST "c" decides to wear out on me (I had the earlier revision "a" of the same model that I've now retired, after I noticed it began to return errors during EAC secure mode rip after years of heavy use).Īnyway, the only DVD-RW drives readily available for a low price today seem to be those which support M-Disc technology.